Examining the Predictors of Innovative Teaching Practices among Indonesian Lecturers
Examen de los predictores de prácticas de enseñanza innovadoras entre profesores de Indonesia
Examinando os preditores de práticas de ensino inovadoras entre professores indonésios
Los rápidos avances tecnológicos han cambiado el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje. En consecuencia, los profesores deben realizar innovaciones en las prácticas docentes
para que sean efectivas y eficientes. Sin embargo, no hay suficiente literatura que explique las competencias clave para la enseñanza innovadora. La mayoría de esta investiga la enseñanza innovadora en perspectivas generales y teóricas. Este estudio intenta explorar el predictor clave de prácticas de enseñanza innovadoras. Se utilizó el modelado de ecuaciones estructurales (sem) para examinar el modelo de investigación en una población de 274 participantes elegidos al azar. Se aplicó un cuestionario en línea para llegar a los participantes que representan a nuestra población (conferencistas indonesios). El resultado indica que cuatro competencias (pedagógica, de aprendizaje, tecnológica y social) predicen significativamente el desempeño innovador de los docentes. Los hallazgos brindan información importante para los interesados en promover habilidades de enseñanza innovadoras entre los profesores de Indonesia.
Enseñanza innovadora, competencias clave, predictor, profesores de Indonesia (es)
ensino inovador, competências essenciais, preditor, professores Indonésios (pt)
Akhavan, P., & Mahdi Hosseini, S. (2016). Social capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: an empirical study of R&D teams in Iran. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(1), 96-113. doi:10.1080/09537325.2015.1072622
Alvarez-Bell, R. M., Wirtz, D., & Bian, H. (2017). Identifying keys to
success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and instructional practices as predictors of student learning in a course using a team-based learning approach. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 128-146.
Beer, P., & Mulder, R. H. (2020). The effects of technological developments on work and their implications for continuous vocational education and training: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(918). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00918.
Beghetto, R. A. (2005). Does Assessment Kill Student Creativity? The Educational Forum, 69(3), 254-263. doi:10.1080/00131720508984694
Bolívar-Ramos, M. T., García-Morales, V. J., & García-Sánchez, E. (2012). Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 331-357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.006
Brouwer, N., & Korthagen, F. (2005). Can teacher education make a difference? American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 153-224. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042001153.
Bulger, M. E., Mayer, R. E., & Metzger, M. J. (2014). Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1567-1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9507 2.
Butterworth, J., & Strauch, J. D. (1994). The relationship between social competence and success in the competitive workplace for persons with mental retardation. Council for Exceptional Children/Div on Developmental Disabilities.
Cairney, T. (2000). The knowledge based economy: A review of the literature. nsw Board of Vocational Education and Training.
Cao, C., Shang, L., & Meng, Q. (2020). Applying the Job Demands-Resources Model to exploring predictors of innovative teaching among university teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103009
Chen, S. C. (2009). A study of the Relations between Innovative Teaching Capacity and Teaching Effectiveness of Teachers in Elementary and Junior High Schools in Penghu Country. Retrieved from http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/login?o=dwebmge&cache=1283038497890
Chen, S. C. (2009). A study of the relations between innovative teaching capacity and teaching effectiveness of teachers in elementary and junior high schools in Penghu County. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/ gs32/gsweb.cgi/login?o=dwebmge&cache=1283038497890.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. doi:10.2307/2393553
Creighton, W., Kilcoyne, M., Tarver, R., & Wright, S. (2006). COMPUTER LITERACY LEVELS OF STUDENTS ENROLLING IN A POST-SECONDARY COMPUTER APPLICATIONS/INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COURSE. Information Technology, Learning & Performance Journal, 24(1).
de Jong, J. P. J., & Kemp, R. (2003). Determinants of Co-Workers' Innovative Behaviour: An Investigation into Knowledge Intensive Services. International Journal of Innovation Management, 07(02), 189-212. doi:10.1142/S1363919603000787
Dorgu, T. E. (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for Effective Curriculum Implementation in the Classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(6), 77-87. doi:10.11648/j.ijsedu.s.2015030601.13
Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy-related Responding: Associations with Prosocial Behavior, Aggression, and Intergroup Relations. Social issues and policy review, 4(1), 143-180. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x
Ellis, S., & Barrs, M. (2008). The assessment of creative learning. London: Creative Partnerships.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, M. B. (1978). A Three Stage Model for Gifted Education. G/C/T, 1(4), 3-57. doi:10.1177/107621757800100403
Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Literature review on Innovation and Creativity in E&T in the EU Member States. Retrieved from http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
Gilbert, A., Tait-McCutcheon, S., & Knewstubb, B. (2021). Innovative
teaching in higher education: Teachers’ perceptions of support and
constraint. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1715816.
Gotz, T., Lohrmann, K., Ganser, B., & Haag, L. (2005). Einsatz von Unterrichtsmethoden: Konstanz oder Wandel? . Empirische Padagogik, 19(4), 342-360. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-137859.
Hannon, J. (2008). Breaking down online teaching: Innovation and resistance. Paper presented at the ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2008. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/46212.
Havighurst, R. J. (2018). Teaching: Function and roles of teachers. Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/teaching.
Izmirli, Ö., & Kurt, A. A. (2009). Basic competencies of instructional technologists. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 998 1002.
Jaskyte, K., Taylor, H., & Smariga, R. (2009). Student and faculty perceptions of innovative teaching. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 111-116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633673
Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., Lebuda, I., & Wiśniewska, E. (2007). Creative teaching of creativity teachers: Polish perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 57-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.004
King, H., Miller, C. L., & Bayerl, J. (2017). Building Technology Competency: an Evidence-Based Approach to Improving Student Technology Skills. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(1), 45-55. doi:10.1007/s41686-017-0001-5
Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Teachers’ perspectives on innovations: Implications for educational design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 985-997. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.004
Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 157-176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004
Lau, J. (2008). Information literacy: International perspectives. De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783598440946.
Liakopoulou, M. (2011). Teachers' Pedagogical Competence as a Prerequisite for Entering the Profession. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 474-488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01495.x
Liu, W., & Shi, J. (2007). An Analysis of Language Teaching Approaches and MethodsEffectiveness and Weakness. US-China Education Review, 4(1), 69-71. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED497389
Ma, H. K. (2012). Social competence as a positive youth development construct: a conceptual review. TheScientificWorldJournal, 2012, 287472-287472. doi:10.1100/2012/287472
Madhavaram, S., & Laverie, D. A. (2010). Developing Pedagogical Competence: Issues and Implications for Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(2), 197-213. doi:10.1177/0273475309360162
Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(1), 59-84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00045-6
Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (2001). Similarities and Differences in Teachers' Practical Knowledge About Teaching Reading Comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 171-184. doi:10.1080/00220670109599914.
Migdadi, M. M. (2021). Organizational learning capability, innovation and organizational performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2018-0246.
Orpinas, P. (2010). Social competence. In I. B. Weiner & W.E. Craighead The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (Eds.), https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0887.
Pantić, N., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher competencies as a basis for teacher education – Views of Serbian teachers and teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 694-703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.005.
Parry, S. B. (1996). The quest for competencies: competency studies can help you make HR decision, but the results are only as good as the study. Training, 33(4), 48-56.
Poole, M. E., Nielsen, S. W., Horrigan, L. M., & Langan-Fox, J. (1998). Competencies for professionals and managers in the context of educational reform. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17(2), 87-107.
Rafsanjani, M. A., Hakim, L., Laily, N., Wijaya, P. A., & Irwansyah, M.
R. (2021). Exploring the predictor of innovative teaching using the
job demands-resources model. The Education and Science Journal,
(3), 58-74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-
-3-58-74.
Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for Creative Potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 317-324. doi:10.1080/00313830308598
Ryegård, Å., Apelgren, K., & Olsson, T. (2010). A Swedish Perspective on Pedagogical Competence.
Sahin, I., & Thompson, A. (2006). Using Rogers’ Theory to Interpret Instructional Computer Use by COE Faculty. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 81-104. doi:10.1080/15391523.2006.10782474
Sahin, I., & Thompson, A. (2006). Using Rogers’ theory to interpret instructional computer Use by coe Faculty. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/153915 23.2006.10782474.
Schiavi, G. S., & Behr, A. (2018). Emerging technologies and new business models: A review on disruptive business models. Innovation & Management Review, 15(4), 338-355. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2018-0013.
Simplicio, J. S. (2000). Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teachers. Education, 120(4), 675-680.
Škerlavaj, M., Song, J. H., & Lee, Y. (2010). Organizational learning culture, innovative culture and innovations in South Korean firms. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6390-6403. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.080
Skutil, M., Havlíčková, K., & Matějíčková, R. (2016). Teaching methods in primary education from the teacher’s point of view. SHS Web of Conferences, 26. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601001
Solimun, Fernandes, A. A. R., & Nurjannah. (2017). Metode Statistika Multivariat Pemodelan Persamaan Struktural (SEM) Pendekatan WarpPLS. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: models for superior performanc. New York: Wiley.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1998). The concept of creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of
creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/
CBO9780511807916.003.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stoof, A., Martens, R. L., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2000). What is competence? A constructivist approach as a way out of confusion the annual conference of the Dutch Educational Research Association (vor).
Trochim, W. M. K. (2001). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. New York: Thomson Learning.
Williamson, B., & Payton, S. (2009). Curriculum and Teaching Innovation: Transforming Classroom Practice and Personalisation: a Handbook from Futurelab: Futurelab.
Yams, N. B. (2017). Integrated Model of innovative competence. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 3, 140-169.
Zhang, A., Olelewe, C. J., Orji, C. T., Ibezim, N. E., Sunday, N. H.,
Obichukwu, P. U., & Okanazu, O. O. (2020). Effects of innovative and traditional teaching methods on technical college students’ achievement in computer craft practices. sage Open, 10(4),
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982986.
Zhu, C., & Wang, D. (2014). Key competencies and characteristics for innovative teaching among secondary school teachers: a mixed-methods research. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(2), 299-311. doi:10.1007/s12564-014-9329-6
Zhu, C., Wang, D., Cai, Y., & Engels, N. (2013). What core competencies are related to teachers’ innovative teaching? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 9-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.753984
Zorza, J. P., Marino, J., de Lemus, S., & Acosta Mesas, A. (2013). Academic Performance and Social Competence of Adolescents: Predictions based on Effortful Control and Empathy. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E87. doi:10.1017/sjp.2013.87
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Citaciones
Métricas PlumX
Visitas
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista Colombiana de Educación
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Todo el trabajo debe ser original e inédito. La presentación de un artículo para publicación implica que el autor ha dado su consentimiento para que el artículo se reproduzca en cualquier momento y en cualquier forma que la Revista Colombiana de Educación considere apropiada. Los artículos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no necesariamente representan la opinión de la revista, ni de su editor. La recepción de un artículo no implicará ningún compromiso de la Revista Colombiana de Educación para su publicación. Sin embargo, de ser aceptado los autores cederán sus derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional para los fines pertinentes de reproducción, edición, distribución, exhibición y comunicación en Colombia y fuera de este país por medios impresos, electrónicos, CD ROM, Internet o cualquier otro medio conocido o por conocer. Los asuntos legales que puedan surgir luego de la publicación de los materiales en la revista son responsabilidad total de los autores. Cualquier artículo de esta revista se puede usar y citar siempre que se haga referencia a él correctamente.
