Scientific Literacy: The Conceptual Framework Prevailing over the First Decade of the Twenty-First Century
Alfabetización científica: el marco conceptual que prevalece en la primera década del siglo XXI
Literacia científica: enquadramento conceptual que prevalece na primeira década do século XXI.
El término alfabetización científica surge como consecuencia de la necesidad de la comunidad científica de ver validada, por parte de la población, la producción científica y tecnológica. El constructo Alfabetización científica fue objeto de varias actualizaciones conceptuales a lo largo de los años como resultado de los cambios científicos, tecnológicos y sociales de la sociedad contemporánea. En esta investigación se realiza una revisión sistemática en la cual se analiza la evolución
de la alfabetización científica en la primera década de este siglo. Buscamos evaluar la evolución del constructo Alfabetización científica durante la primera década del siglo XXI, a través de una investigación cualitativa, realizando un estudio bibliográfico. Para la operacionalización de este análisis, se definieron diferentes dimensiones de la alfabetización científica. Los resultados indican que es un constructo de naturaleza deíctica, que conforma su contenido a los entornos social, político, cultural y científico en que se inserta. La conclusión es que toda esta matriz conceptual sugiere un cambio en la forma relativamente pasiva como se aprecia la ciencia y como esta funciona en la sociedad hacia un compromiso de implicación personal con la ciencia y hacia la valoración de la utilidad del conocimiento científico a lo largo de la vida.
alfabetización científica, estudio bibliográfico, ciencia y sociedad, investigación cualitativa, entorno social (es)
literacia científica, revisão da literatura, ciência e sociedade, investigação qualitativa, enquadramento social (pt)
Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., Donnelly, L. A. (2010). On the nature of teaching nature of science: Preservice early childhood teachers’ instruction in preschool and elementary settings. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 47(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20323
Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2010). In search of well-started beginning science teachers: Insights from two first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20359
Baker, D. R., Lewis, E. B., Purzer, S., Watts, N. B., Perkins, G., Uysal, S., Wong, S., Beard, R. & Lang, M. (2009). The Communication in Science Inquiry Project (cisip): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 259–274.
Bauer, M. W., Gaskell, G., Durant, J., Midden, C., Liakopoulous, M., & Scholten, L. (2003). Two cultures of public understanding of science and
technology in Europe. In M. Dierkes & C. von Grote (Eds.), Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology (pp. 61–74).
Taylor & Francis Group.
Boujaoude, S. (2002). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066494
Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes:
Perspectives from pisa 2006 science. International Journal of Science
Education, 33(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.51
Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). pisa 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8),
–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20333
Caraça, J. (2001). Ciência. Quimera. Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S.W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
Christensen, C. (2009). Risk and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142293
Dani, D. (2009). Scientific literacy and purposes for teaching science: A case study of Lebanese private school teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 289–299. http://www.ijese.com/IJESE_v4n3_Special_Issue_Dani.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How Teacher Education Matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003002
Davies, S., McCallie, E., Simonsson, E., Lehr, J. L., & Duensing, S. (2008). Discussing dialogue: Perspectives on the value of science dialogue
events that do not inform policy. Public Understanding of Science, 18(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079760
Deboer, G. E. (1991). A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications
for Practice. Teachers College Press.
Deboer, G. E. (2000). Scientific Literacy : Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Dijk, E. M., van. (2011). Portraying real science in science communication. Science Education, 95(6), 1086–1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20458
Dijk, E. M., van & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ pck and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.002
Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 201–213. http://www.ijese.com/ijese_Volume4_Issue3_July_2009.pdf#page=11
Dupré, J. A. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press.
Eijck, M., van & Roth, W. M. (2010). Theorizing scientific literacy in the wild. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.03.002.
Einsiedel, E. (2007). Editorial: Of publics and science. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071289
Fensham, P. J. (2009). Real world contexts in pisa science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 46(8), 884–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20334
Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 214–235.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20095
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H.(2009). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence, Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P., & Holmgren, S. (2010). Teachers’ Language on Scientific Inquiry: Methods of teaching or methods of inquiry? International
Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1151–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902977457
Hand, B., Yore, L. D., Jagger, S., & Prain, V. (2010). Connecting research in science literacy and classroom practice: A review of science
teaching journals in Australia, the uk and the United States, 1998–2008. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562342
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal Issues and Their Importance for Contemporary Science Education—A Pedagogical Justification and the State-of-the-Art in Israel, Germany, and the usa.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-
x(199806)82:3<407::aid-sce6>3.0.co;2-g.
Irwin, A., & Michael, M. (2003). Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Open University Press.
Jenkins, E. W. (2002) Linking school science education with action. In W.-M. Roth and J. Désautels (Eds.), Science Education as/for Sociopolitical Action (pp. 17–34). Peter Lang.
Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Tutton, R. (2007). Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127060
Kim, M., & Roth, W.-M. (2008). Rethinking the ethics of scientific knowledge: A case study of teaching the environment in science classrooms.
Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03025667
Klein, P. D., & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (2010). Multimodal literacies in science: Currency, coherence and focus. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9159-4
Klop, T., Severiens, S. E., Knippels, M. P. J., van Mil, M. H. W., & Ten Dam, G. T. M. (2010). Effects of a Science Education Module on Attitudes towards Modern Biotechnology of Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1127–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902943665
Laudan, L. (1996). The demise of the demarcation problem. In M. Ruse (Ed.), But is it science? The philosophical question in the creation/evolution controversy (pp. 337-350). Prometheus Books.
Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.
Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69–119.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562433
Levitt, K. E. (2002). An Analysis of Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs Regarding the Teaching and Learning of Science. Science Education, 86(1), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042
Liu, O. L., Lee, H. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). An investigation of teacher impact on student inquiry science performance using a hierarchical linear model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20372
Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: Science and the public. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 301–311.
http://www.ijese.com/ijese_v4n3_Special_Issue_Lui.pdf
Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting scientific literacy using a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: Concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 231–245.
McDonald, S., & Songer, N. B. (2008). Enacting classroom inquiry: Theorizing teachers’ conceptions of science teaching. Science Education,
(6), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20293
Michael, M. (2002). Comprehension, Apprehension, Prehension: Heterogeneity and the Public Understanding of Science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27(3), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700302
Miller, J. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
Miller, J. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504044908.
Miller, J., & Pardo, R. (2003). Civic scientific literacy and attitude to science and technology: A comparative analysis of the European Union, the
United States, Japan, and Canada. In M. Dierkes & C. von Grote (Eds.), Between Understanding and Trust. The Public, Science, and Technology (pp. 81–130). Taylor & Francis Group.
Murcia, K. (2009). Re-thinking the development of scientific literacy through a rope metaphor. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9081-1
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
Osborne, J. (2007). Science Education for the Twenty First Century, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Osborne, J., Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. The Nuffield Foundation.
Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in stse education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20435
Plakitsi, K. (2010). Collective curriculum design as tool for rethinking scientific literacy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 577–590.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9288-0
Roth, W. (2007). Toward a dialectical notion and praxis of scientific literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270601032025
Roth, W., & Lee, S. (2001). Rethinking scientific literacy: From science education as propaedeutic to participation in the community. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED478153.pdf
Roth, W., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
Roth, W., Lee, Y., & Hsu, P. (2009). A tool for changing the world: Possibilities of cultural-historical activity theory to reinvigorate science
education. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 131–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142269
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What Large-Scale, Survey Research Tells Us About Teacher Effects On Student Achievement: Insights
from the Prospects Study of Elementary Schools. CPRE Research Reports. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/31
Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89(5), 803–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20071
Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives
and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353– 376. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20142
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
Schroeder, M., Mckeough, A., Graham, S., Stock, H., & Bisanz, G. (2009). The contribution of trade books to early science literacy: In and out of school. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9082-0
Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & McDonald, S. (2003). Research Towards an Expanded Understanding of Inquiry Science Beyond One Idealized Standard. Science Education, 87(4), 490–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10085
Sülün, Y., Yurttas, G. D., & Ekiz, S. O. (2009). Determination of science literacy levels of the classroom teachers (A case of Muǧla city in Turkey). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 723–730.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.127
Symington, D., & Tytler, R. (2004). Community leaders’ views of the purposes of science in the compulsory years of schooling. International
Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1403–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690410001673793
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization-Unesco. (2014). Adult and Youth Literacy. Institute for Statistics, (32), 1–4.
http://www.uis.unesco.org/data/atlas-literacy/en
Wei, B. (2009). In search of meaningful integration: The experiences of developing integrated science curricula in junior secondary schools in China. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701687430
Witz, K. G., & Lee, H. (2009). Science as an ideal: teachers’ orientations to science and science education reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies,
(3), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270802165640
Wolfensberger, B., Piniel, J., Canella, C., & Kyburz-Graber, R. (2010). The challenge of involvement in reflective teaching: Three case studies from a teacher education project on conducting classroom discussions on socio-scientific issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 714–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.007
Yore, L. D., Gay, L., Hand, B. M., & State, I. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science
research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000076661
Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4
Yuenyong, C., & Narjaikaew, P. (2009). Scientific literacy and Thailand science education. International Journal of Environmental and Science
Education, 4(3), 335–349.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond sts: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education.
Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Citaciones
Métricas PlumX
Visitas
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Revista Colombiana de Educación

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Todo el trabajo debe ser original e inédito. La presentación de un artículo para publicación implica que el autor ha dado su consentimiento para que el artículo se reproduzca en cualquier momento y en cualquier forma que la Revista Colombiana de Educación considere apropiada. Los artículos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no necesariamente representan la opinión de la revista, ni de su editor. La recepción de un artículo no implicará ningún compromiso de la Revista Colombiana de Educación para su publicación. Sin embargo, de ser aceptado los autores cederán sus derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional para los fines pertinentes de reproducción, edición, distribución, exhibición y comunicación en Colombia y fuera de este país por medios impresos, electrónicos, CD ROM, Internet o cualquier otro medio conocido o por conocer. Los asuntos legales que puedan surgir luego de la publicación de los materiales en la revista son responsabilidad total de los autores. Cualquier artículo de esta revista se puede usar y citar siempre que se haga referencia a él correctamente.